Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Kale F.

In re Kale F.

269 A.D.2d 832, 703 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1764
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 832 (In re Kale F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kale F., 269 A.D.2d 832, 703 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of disposition that placed him in the custody of the Steuben County Department of Social Services for a 14-month period, until August 30, 1999. That order expired and the appeal is [833]*833moot (see, Matter of Michael OO., 267 AD2d 638; Matter of Alice P., 254 AD2d 770). This appeal fails to satisfy the “three critical conditions to the mootness exception” (Matter of Chenier v Richard W., 82 NY2d 830, 832; see also, Mental Hygiene Legal Servs. v Ford, 92 NY2d 500, 505-506; but see, Matter of Jennifer B., 256 AD2d 1195), and there is no indication in the record that respondent is still being affected by that order (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., supra, at 832). Consequently, we dismiss the appeal. (Appeal from Order of Steuben County Family Court, Bradstreet, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Wisner, J. P., Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M., LENORES S., MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
D., SYSAMOUTH, MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
In re Sysamouth D.
98 A.D.3d 1314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Zachary D.
46 A.D.3d 1472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Matthew C.
37 A.D.3d 1092 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Amber H.
28 A.D.3d 1218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Gerard M.
28 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Anthony C.
27 A.D.3d 1176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Frederick T.
270 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 832, 703 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kale-f-nyappdiv-2000.