In re Meyer
156 A.D. 930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Meyer. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 A.D. 174 →
Opinion
No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. (Ingraham, P. J., and McLaughlin, J., dissented upon the ground that the only property which purported to pass by the will was the equity of redemption in certain real estate, and the appellant proved there was no such equity.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Meyer, 156 A.D. 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
156 A.D. 930 (In re Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.