In re Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Meyer

146 A.D. 626, 131 N.Y.S. 380, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3329

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 1911·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

McLaughlin, J.:

This appeal is from an order sustaining a writ of habeas corpus and awarding the custody.of an infant under two years of age to the father, Leopold Alfred Meyer, and permitting the maternal grandparents' to visit such infant at stated periods and permitting her to remain at their residence for a period of at least six days in each month. The father of the infant appeals from so much of the order as permits the grandparents to visit the child and- directs her to be taken to their residence for a period of at least six days in each and every month, and the grandparents appeal from so much of the order as awards the custody to the father. On the return of the writ the learned justice sitting at Special Term disposed of the matter solely upon affidavits presented by the respective parties. These affidavits are so conflicting that it is utterly impossible to determine whether the father is a proper person to have the custody of the infant, or whether it will be for her interest to be placed in the custody of the grandparents.

In view of the conflict in the affidavits, I think the proper disposition to make of this appeal is to reverse the order appealed from, without costs to either party, and send' the matter to a referee to take proof and report the same, together with his opinion thereon, to the Special Term of this court.

Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, without costs, and reference ordered as stated in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLaughlin, J.:

This appeal is from an order sustaining a writ of habeas corpus and awarding the custody.of an infant under two years of age to the father, Leopold Alfred Meyer, and permitting the maternal grandparents' to visit such infant at stated periods and permitting her to remain at their residence for a period of at least six days in each month. The father of the infant appeals from so much of the order as permits the grandparents to visit the child and- directs her to be taken to their residence for a period of at least six days in each and every month, and the grandparents appeal from so much of the order as awards the custody to the father. On the return of the writ the learned justice sitting at Special Term disposed of the matter solely upon affidavits presented by the respective parties. These affidavits are so conflicting that it is utterly impossible to determine whether the father is a proper person to have the custody of the infant, or whether it will be for her interest to be placed in the custody of the grandparents.

In view of the conflict in the affidavits, I think the proper disposition to make of this appeal is to reverse the order appealed from, without costs to either party, and send' the matter to a referee to take proof and report the same, together with his opinion thereon, to the Special Term of this court.

Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, without costs, and reference ordered as stated in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.

In re Meyer, 146 A.D. 626, 131 N.Y.S. 380, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

146 A.D. 626 (In re Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related