In Re Melvin Lenkin, Thelma Z. Lenkin

D.C. Circuit

In Re Melvin Lenkin, Thelma Z. Lenkin

966 F.2d 702, 296 U.S. App. D.C. 182, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23763, 1992 WL 132443

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 1992

Docket92-7083

StatusUnpublished

This text of 966 F.2d 702 (In Re Melvin Lenkin, Thelma Z. Lenkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Melvin Lenkin, Thelma Z. Lenkin, 966 F.2d 702, 296 U.S. App. D.C. 182, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23763, 1992 WL 132443 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

966 F.2d 702

296 U.S.App.D.C. 182

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
In re Melvin LENKIN, Thelma Z. Lenkin, Petitioners.

No. 92-7083.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 20, 1992.

Before WALD, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied. Mandamus is a drastic remedy "to be invoked only in extraordinary circumstances." Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 34 (1980). Petitioners have failed to establish that their right to such extraordinary relief is "clear and indisputable." See Kerr v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976); In Re Dep't of Defense, 848 F.2d 232, 235 (D.C.Cir.1988). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that this court's order of May 16, 1992, staying the district court's pretrial order be vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI