In re Melchor

67 S.W.3d 243, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 2636, 2000 WL 424319
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 2000
DocketNo. 01-00-00254-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 S.W.3d 243 (In re Melchor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Melchor, 67 S.W.3d 243, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 2636, 2000 WL 424319 (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Relator has sought postconviction relief under Tex.Code CRim. P. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp.1999-2000). In response to relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus, the trial court signed an order on December 21, 1999 ordering the attorney who represented relator in the criminal proceeding against him to file an affidavit.

In this mandamus proceeding, relator complains that the attorney has not filed such an affidavit and asks this Court to order the attorney to do so. This Court has no mandamus jurisdiction over the attorney. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp.2000). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard Bernard Stepp v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009
In Re State
26 S.W.3d 759 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.W.3d 243, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 2636, 2000 WL 424319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-melchor-texapp-2000.