Richard Bernard Stepp v. State

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00099-CR

RICHARD BERNARD STEPP, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 06-03822-CRF-272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard Bernard Stepp seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion for

judgment nunc pro tunc which he filed nearly two years after his conviction became

final. The Clerk of this Court advised the parties that the appeal is subject to dismissal

for want of jurisdiction because it appears there has been no appealable order. See

Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d). The Clerk also

notified the parties that the appeal may be dismissed unless a response was filed

showing grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has been filed. This Court does not have jurisdiction to review an order in a criminal case unless

that jurisdiction is expressly granted by the Texas Constitution or by statute. See Abbott

v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Everett, 82 S.W.3d at 735. No

statute vests this Court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a

motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

FELIPE REYNA Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 24, 2009 Do not publish [CR25]

Stepp v. State Page 2