In re: McLean
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1051
In Re: CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:90-cr-00105; 2:08-cv-00588)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland McLean, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Cleveland McLean, Jr., petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Although we
find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is
not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without
prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the
district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re: McLean (In re: McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.