In Re: McClelland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1298
In Re: ANTHONY D. MCCLELLAND, a/k/a Ant,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony D. McClelland, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony D. McClelland petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
He seeks an order from this court directing the district court
to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that
the district court has denied McClelland’s § 3582 motion.
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided
McClelland’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: McClelland (In Re: McClelland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.