In re McAneny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re McAneny

215 A.D. 797, 213 N.Y.S. 848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D. 797 (In re McAneny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McAneny, 215 A.D. 797, 213 N.Y.S. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Since the decision in Browne v. City of New York and Schieffelin v. Mills (241 N. Y. 96, affg. the determination of this court, 213 App. Div. 206), there can be no longer any question as to the authority of the Transit Commission to institute and conduct such an investigation as is here involved, and to subpoena witnesses, as provided by section 19 of the Public Service Commission Law. Subdivision 2 of section 19 of that statute gives the Commission authority to apply for an order of commitment. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to commit the respondent granted. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Since the decision in Browne v. City of New York and Schieffelin v. Mills (241 N. Y. 96, affg. the determination of this court, 213 App. Div. 206), there can be no longer any question as to the authority of the Transit Commission to institute and conduct such an investigation as is here involved, and to subpoena witnesses, as provided by section 19 of the Public Service Commission Law. Subdivision 2 of section 19 of that statute gives the Commission authority to apply for an order of commitment. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to commit the respondent granted. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D. 797, 213 N.Y.S. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcaneny-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack