In Re McAllister-Mohler Co.
46 F.2d 91, 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1579
Opinion
In re McALLISTER-MOHLER CO.
District Court, S. D. Ohio, E. D.
*92 *93 *94 *95 *96 *97 *98 *99 Arnold, Wright, Purpus & Harlor, of Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.
Hedges, Hoover & Tingley, and Watson, Davis & Joseph, of Columbus, Ohio, for trustee.
HOUGH, District Judge.
Petition in review dismissed, and findings and conclusions of referee approved and confirmed, upon authority of Wells v. Realty Co. (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 237 and Kothe, Trustee, v. R. C. Taylor Trust, 280 U. S. 224, 50 S. Ct. 142, 74 L. Ed. 382.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re McAllister-Mohler Co., 46 F.2d 91, 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1579 (S.D. Ohio 1930).
46 F.2d 91 (In Re McAllister-Mohler Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawkinson v. Johnston
122 F.2d 724 (Eighth Circuit, 1941)
Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. Palmer
305 U.S. 493 (Supreme Court, 1939)