in Re: Max B. Hanson
Opinion
NO. 12-14-00015-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
IN RE: §
MAX B. HANSON, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR §
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Max B. Hanson filed this original mandamus proceeding complaining of the trial court’s order setting aside the mediated settlement agreement (MSA) between Max and his wife, Marie, in their divorce proceeding. On February 27, 2015, this court conditionally granted Max’s petition and directed Respondent to (1) vacate his November 13, 2013 order setting aside the MSA and (2) render judgment on the MSA pursuant to Family Code Section 6.602. Respondent has now complied with this court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the Hanson’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Opinion delivered April 8, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
APRIL 8, 2015
IN RE: MAX B. HANSON, Relator v. HON. ROBERT K. INSELMANN, JR., Respondent
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by MAX B. HANSON, who is the relator in Cause No. DV-00731-12-01, pending on the docket of the County Court at Law #1 of Angelina County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on January 15, 2014, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that this original proceeding should be dismissed as moot, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Max B. Hanson (in Re: Max B. Hanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.