In Re Matthew Duke v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 12, 2025
No. 04-25-00406-CV
IN RE Matthew DUKE
Original Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
On June 26, 2025, relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus. The real party in interest has filed multiple responses and relator has filed multiple replies. After considering the petition, the record, and the filings of the parties, this court concludes that relator has not established that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on November 12, 2025.
____________________________ H. Todd McCray, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of November, 2025.
_____________________________ Caitlin A. McCamish, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-02375, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Matthew Duke and Christie Lynn Terrell and In the Interest of P.O.T., a Child, pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Matthew Duke v. the State of Texas (In Re Matthew Duke v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.