In Re Matthew Duke v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Matthew Duke v. the State of Texas (In Re Matthew Duke v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00353-CV
IN RE Matthew DUKE
Original Proceeding 1 0F
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 11, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator filed his petition for writ of mandamus on June 2, 2025. Real party in interest filed
a response on June 4, 2025. Having considered the petition, response, record, and applicable law,
the court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, the petition
for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-02375, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Matthew Duke and Christie Lynn Terrell and in the Interest of P.O.T., a child, pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Matthew Duke v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-matthew-duke-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.