In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleisher v. Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg
This text of 803 F.2d 1085 (In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleisher v. Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35(b). The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.
With this order, the slip opinion filed August 13,1986 [796 F.2d 1165], is amended by adding a new footnote 26, on page 46 [p. 1188] at the end of the second sentence in the second full paragraph ending with “sanctioning authority,” and renumbering footnote 26 at the end of the paragraph to be footnote 27, as follows:
“Nothing we have said in this opinion should be construed to impair in any way, nor to preclude, an award based on bad faith conduct under the court’s inherent power, if found to be appropriate. See, e.g., Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752 [100 S.Ct. 2455, 65 L.Ed.2d 488] (1980).”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
803 F.2d 1085, 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1443, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 37453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-matter-of-stephen-yagman-jerry-brown-and-gerry-fleisher-v-michael-ca9-1986.