RP Golden State Management, LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company

E.D. California

RP Golden State Management, LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company

DecidedApril 5, 2021

Docket1:19-cv-00600

StatusUnknown

This text of RP Golden State Management, LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company (RP Golden State Management, LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RP Golden State Management, LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 RP GOLDEN STATE MANAGEMENT, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00600-DAD-JLT LLC, ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISREGARDING MISCELLANEOUS ) MOTION 13 v. ) ) (Doc. 80) 14 OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE ) 15 COMPANY, ) Defendant. ) 16 )

17 On March 8, 2021, Mr. Desai, on behalf of the plaintiff, filed a miscellaneous motion. (Doc. 18 80.) However, the Court has previously advised Mr. Desai that Local Rule 183(a) provides that “[a] 19 corporation or other entity may appear only by an attorney.” RP Golden State Management, LLC is a 20 limited liability company, and they may not appear in this action unless they retain 21 appropriate counsel. See McGowan v. Boek, 402 F. App’x 287, 288 (9th Cir. 2010) (affirming 22 dismissal of case because corporate plaintiff was not represented by counsel) (collecting cases); In re 23 Highley, 459 F.2d 554, 555 (9th Cir. 1972) (“A corporation can appear in a court proceeding only 24 through an attorney at law.”) (collecting cases). Therefore, the motion is hereby DISREGARDED. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 Dated: April 3, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 28 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 RP GOLDEN STATE MANAGEMENT, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00600-DAD-JLT LLC, ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISREGARDING MISCELLANEOUS ) MOTION 13 v. ) ) (Doc. 80) 14 OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE ) 15 COMPANY, ) Defendant. ) 16 )

17 On March 8, 2021, Mr. Desai, on behalf of the plaintiff, filed a miscellaneous motion. (Doc. 18 80.) However, the Court has previously advised Mr. Desai that Local Rule 183(a) provides that “[a] 19 corporation or other entity may appear only by an attorney.” RP Golden State Management, LLC is a 20 limited liability company, and they may not appear in this action unless they retain 21 appropriate counsel. See McGowan v. Boek, 402 F. App’x 287, 288 (9th Cir. 2010) (affirming 22 dismissal of case because corporate plaintiff was not represented by counsel) (collecting cases); In re 23 Highley, 459 F.2d 554, 555 (9th Cir. 1972) (“A corporation can appear in a court proceeding only 24 through an attorney at law.”) (collecting cases). Therefore, the motion is hereby DISREGARDED. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 Dated: April 3, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 28 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

RP Golden State Management, LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rp-golden-state-management-llc-v-ohio-security-insurance-company-caed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack