in Re: Maryam Jamilah
This text of in Re: Maryam Jamilah (in Re: Maryam Jamilah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Prohibition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 24, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-01038-CV
IN RE MARYAM JAMILAH, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF PROHIBITION
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On November 1, 2004, relator filed a petition for writ of prohibition in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.
A writ of prohibition is proper to prevent a trial court from acting when the court lacks jurisdiction. Bd. of Disciplinary Appeals v. McFall, 888 S.W.2d 471, 472 (Tex. 1994)(orig. proceeding). The writ is designed to operate like an injunction issued by a superior court to control, limit, or prevent action in a court of inferior jurisdiction. Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 767 S.W.2d 680, 682 (Tex. 1989). Relator claims that the justice of the peace did not have jurisdiction to consider a forcible entry and detainer action filed against relator. However, relator has not established that she is entitled to extraordinary relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of prohibition.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 24, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Edelman, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Maryam Jamilah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maryam-jamilah-texapp-2004.