in Re: Maryam Jamilah
This text of in Re: Maryam Jamilah (in Re: Maryam Jamilah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 3, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00842-CV
IN RE MARYAM JAMILAH, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On September 28, 2006, Relator Maryam Jamilah filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief in this Court,[1] complaining of an order signed by Respondent, the Honorable James Blackstock, presiding judge of County Court No. 3, Brazoria County, Texas, on September 14, 2006, in which the amount of relator=s supersedeas bond concerning a judgment on appeal before this Court was increased. After reviewing the argument=s in relator=s petition, we conclude that she has an appellate remedy available under Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.4. Accordingly, we dismiss relator=s petition for writ of mandamus. Relator=s motion for emergency relief will be reviewed as a motion in the pending appeal, Cause No. 14-06-00013-CV.
PER CURIAM
Petition Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 3, 2006.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, and Justices Yates and Seymore.
[1]See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Maryam Jamilah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maryam-jamilah-texapp-2006.