In re Mary B.

190 A.D.2d 1099, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1021
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Motion for extension of time granted to July 2,1993; cross motion to dismiss appeal as moot denied with leave to renew after determination of the appeal from the order terminating parental rights. Memorandum: We are unable to conclude that the appeal from the order adjudicating that respondent neglected his child is moot. Should respondent prevail on the pending appeal from the later order terminating his parental rights, the neglect adjudication may not be moot. Petitioner and the law guardian may renew the motion to dismiss after the appeal from the order terminating parental rights is determined. Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Pine, Doerr and Boomer, JJ. (Filed Jan. 29, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mary B., 190 A.D.2d 1099, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 1099 (In re Mary B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Raychael L.W.
298 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)