In re Mary B.
This text of 186 A.D.2d 1094 (In re Mary B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Motion insofar as it requests an extension of time granted to December 7, 1992 and otherwise denied without prejudice to the submission of a motion for summary reversal and a new trial upon a showing that there are no alternative means available to reconstruct a record for review (see, Matter of Christian v Carty, 122 AD2d 622). Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Pine and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 A.D.2d 1094, 590 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mary-b-nyappdiv-1992.