In re Mary B.
186 A.D.2d 1094, 590 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11857
Opinion
— Motion insofar as it requests an extension of time granted to December 7, 1992 and otherwise denied without prejudice to the submission of a motion for summary reversal and a new trial upon a showing that there are no alternative means available to reconstruct a record for review (see, Matter of Christian v Carty, 122 AD2d 622). Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Pine and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Mary B., 186 A.D.2d 1094, 590 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
186 A.D.2d 1094 (In re Mary B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Christian
122 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)