In Re Martin

29 A.3d 266, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 561, 2011 WL 4596047
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 2011·No. 11-BG-852·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Florida suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of three years, this court’s July 28, 2011 order directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline in the form of a three-years suspension with a condition of fitness should not be imposed, the statement of respondent consenting to reciprocal discipline, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and respondent’s D.C. Bar Rule XI § 14(g) affidavit filed on August 29, 2011, it is

ORDERED that, Gabriel I. Martin, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of three years, nunc pro tunc to August 29, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Martin, 29 A.3d 266, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 561, 2011 WL 4596047 (D.C. 2011).

29 A.3d 266 (In Re Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Kaplan
29 A.3d 266 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)