In Re Kaplan

29 A.3d 266, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 562, 2011 WL 4596052
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 6, 2011
Docket11-BG-636
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.3d 266 (In Re Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Kaplan, 29 A.3d 266, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 562, 2011 WL 4596052 (D.C. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of one year, all stayed in favor of a one-year probationary period, this court’s June 14, 2011 order directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it is

ORDERED that, Michael A. Kaplan, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of one year, all stayed in favor' of a one-year probationary period subject to the conditions imposed in New Jersey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Martin
29 A.3d 266 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.3d 266, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 562, 2011 WL 4596052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaplan-dc-2011.