In Re Kaplan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Kaplan

29 A.3d 266, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 562, 2011 WL 4596052

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 2011·No. 11-BG-636·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of one year, all stayed in favor of a one-year probationary period, this court’s June 14, 2011 order directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it is

ORDERED that, Michael A. Kaplan, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of one year, all stayed in favor' of a one-year probationary period subject to the conditions imposed in New Jersey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of one year, all stayed in favor of a one-year probationary period, this court’s June 14, 2011 order directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it is

ORDERED that, Michael A. Kaplan, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of one year, all stayed in favor' of a one-year probationary period subject to the conditions imposed in New Jersey.

In Re Kaplan, 29 A.3d 266, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 562, 2011 WL 4596052 (D.C. 2011).

Pincite

29 A.3d 266 (In Re Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related