In re: Luis Vidal Montalvo and Maribel Rivera Sanchez

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico
DecidedDecember 7, 2010
Docket05-06917
StatusUnknown

This text of In re: Luis Vidal Montalvo and Maribel Rivera Sanchez (In re: Luis Vidal Montalvo and Maribel Rivera Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Luis Vidal Montalvo and Maribel Rivera Sanchez, (prb 2010).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2 3 IN RE: : : 4 Luis Vidal Montalvo and : Maribel Rivera Sanchez : CASE NO. 05-0006917ESL 5 : Chapter 13 6 Debtor(s) : : 7 ____________________________________: 8 9 OPINION AND ORDER 10 This case is before the court upon the petition for payment of unclaimed funds filed on 11 October 12, 2010 and on November 30, 2010 (dkt. ## 28 and 33) by Luis Vidal Montalvo and Maribel Rivera Sanchez (collectively the “Debtors”). The Debtors allege that the unclaimed funds 12 deposited with the clerk of the U.S. Bankruptcy court by the Chapter 13 trustee belong to them as 13 the creditor has not claimed them. The court disagrees. 14 Background 15 The relevant facts are not in dispute. On July 28, 2005 the Debtors filed a chapter 13 petition 16 and a chapter 13 plan dated May 5, 2005. On October 17, 2005 the court confirmed the plan. The 17 chapter 13 trustee filed reports of unclaimed monies by creditor Associates Finance; on August 13, 18 2010 in the amount of $208.73 (dkt. # 20), on September 9, 2010 in the amount of $189.30 (dkt # 19 22) and on September 22, 2010 in the amount of $208.73 (dkt. #24). The creditor Associates Finance has not requested the payment of the moneys consigned in its name with the bankruptcy 20 court. The debtors claim that the consigned funds be paid to them. 21 Applicable Law 22 Section 347 of the bankruptcy code, 11 U.S.C. § 347, governs unclaimed property, including 23 funds distributed by a chapter 13 trustee pursuant to a confirmed chapter 13 plan and not cashed by 24 the creditor. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3011complements section 347(a). See: 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 16th 25 Edition, ¶ 347.01-347.03, pgs. 347-3 to 347-10. The trustee shall stop payment of any check 26 remaining unpaid ninety days after the final distribution under chapter 7, 12 or 13, and the amounts 27 will be paid into the registry fund of the bankruptcy court as unclaimed funds, and shall be disposed of in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041, 2042. 11 U.S.C. § 347(a). The payment of the property 28 1 forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2042. 2 No money deposited under section 2041 of this title shall be withdrawn except by order of court. 3 In every case in which the right to withdraw money deposited in court under section 2041 4 has been adjudicated or is not in dispute and such money has remained so deposited for at 5 least five years unclaimed by the person entitled thereto, such court shall cause such money to be deposited in the Treasury in the name and to the credit of the United States. Any 6 claimant entitled to any such money may, on petition to the court and upon notice to the United States attorney and full proof of the right thereto, obtain an order directing payment 7 to him. 8 28 U.S.C. 2042 (emphasis ours). Therefore, after five years of the trustee’s deposit of the 9 unclaimed funds with the registry fund have elapsed, any funds still unclaimed are deposited by the 10 bankruptcy court in the U.S. Treasury in the name and to the credit of the United States. “Thereafter, 11 the creditor entitled to any of the funds may file a claim with the bankruptcy court, and if the claim 12 is approved, the Treasury issues a check to the creditor in the principal amount of his or her 13 distributive share.” Leider v. United States, 301 F.3d 1290, 1293 (Fed.Cir.2002) Accordingly, the 14 unclaimed funds deposited by the trustee in the court’s registry fund are held in trust for the person legally entitled to the same. In re Parker, 400 B.R. 55, 59 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2009). 15 Applications for unclaimed funds are generally made ex parte. Thus, bankruptcy courts 16 require exact compliance with the legal requirements for their disbursement and a clear showing that 17 the claimant is actually entitled to the funds. In re Scott, 346 B.R. 557, 558 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2006). 18 Unclaimed funds do not become “surplus funds” when they are not claimed by the creditor who did 19 not cash the check. In re Bradford Production, Inc., 375 B.R. 356, 360 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2007). 20 The creditor retains a property interest in the unclaimed funds. In re Applications for Unclaimed 21 Funds Submitted in Cases Listed on Exhibit “A” , 341 B.R. 65, 69 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2005). The 22 creditor is the rightful owner of the funds when the trustee made the distribution based on a confirmed plan and an allowed proof of claim. In this case, the Debtors have failed to show that they 23 are the rightful owners of the unclaimed funds and not the creditor Associates Financial. 24 25 26 27 28 1 Conclusion 2 In view of the foregoing, the court concludes that the Debtors are not the rightful owners of 3, || the unclaimed funds deposited by the chapter 13 trustee in the name and for the benefit of Associates 4 || Finance. Consequently, the petition for unclaimed funds filed by the Debtors is hereby denied. 5 SO ORDERED. ‘ San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 6" day of December, 2010. 8 co

ique 8. Lamoutte 10 United States Bankruptcy Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Parker
400 B.R. 55 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
In Re Bradford Production, Inc.
375 B.R. 356 (E.D. Michigan, 2007)
In Re Scott
346 B.R. 557 (N.D. Georgia, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Luis Vidal Montalvo and Maribel Rivera Sanchez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-luis-vidal-montalvo-and-maribel-rivera-sanchez-prb-2010.