in Re Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.
This text of in Re Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. (in Re Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00402-CR
IN RE Luis Ray JARAMILLO, Jr.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 30, 2008
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. has filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus,
complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on various documents filed in two of his pending
criminal cases. Relator acknowledges he is represented by trial counsel. We conclude any original
proceeding on the issue presented should be presented by relator’s trial counsel. Relator is not
entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).
The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be
treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2006-CR-5268 and 2006-CR-8791, styled State of Texas v. Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr., pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding. 04-08-00402-CR
806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s mandamus
petition is denied.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-luis-ray-jaramillo-jr-texapp-2008.