In re Lowenthal

3 P. 657, 2 Cal. Unrep. 300
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 29, 1884
DocketNo. 8559
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 P. 657 (In re Lowenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lowenthal, 3 P. 657, 2 Cal. Unrep. 300 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

By the COURT.

This is a proceeding, under section 287 and following sections of the Code of Civil Procedure, to remove or suspend an attorney and counselor of this court. The accusation was made in due form, and, being wholly denied, a reference was made under section 298 to William Craig, Esq. Mr. Craig has. filed his report, accompanied by the evidence taken by him in support of the accusation, as well as that produced by the defense. We have examined the evidence in the case, and do not find it sufficient to justify a removal or suspension of Mr. Lowenthal, and the charges are therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kapelus v. State Bar
745 P.2d 917 (California Supreme Court, 1987)
In re Brown
4 P. 1085 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 P. 657, 2 Cal. Unrep. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lowenthal-cal-1884.