in Re Lowell Quincy Green
This text of in Re Lowell Quincy Green (in Re Lowell Quincy Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-19-00017-CR
IN RE LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this mandamus proceeding, relator, Lowell Quincy Green, complains about
actions purportedly taken by Jon R. Gimble, the McLennan County District Clerk. There
are procedural problems with Green’s request, including a failure to serve his mandamus
petition on the District Clerk as the respondent or the State as the real party in interest.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 52.2. However, we use Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 and
look beyond these deficiencies to dispose of Green’s petition. See id. at R. 2.
As a Court of Appeals, we have no jurisdiction to compel a district clerk to act,
except to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004); see also In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d 874, 879 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding).
Green has not alleged any need for this Court to protect that jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss Green’s “Original Application for Writ of Mandamus”
for want of jurisdiction.
AL SCOGGINS Senior Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Senior Justice Al Scoggins1 Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 30, 2019 [OT06]
1The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).
In re Green Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Lowell Quincy Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lowell-quincy-green-texapp-2019.