in Re Lowell Quincy Green

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 2019·No. 10-19-00017-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00017-CR

IN RE LOWELL QUINCY GREEN

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this mandamus proceeding, relator, Lowell Quincy Green, complains about

actions purportedly taken by Jon R. Gimble, the McLennan County District Clerk. There

are procedural problems with Green’s request, including a failure to serve his mandamus

petition on the District Clerk as the respondent or the State as the real party in interest.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 52.2. However, we use Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 and

look beyond these deficiencies to dispose of Green’s petition. See id. at R. 2.

As a Court of Appeals, we have no jurisdiction to compel a district clerk to act,

except to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004); see also In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d 874, 879 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding).

Green has not alleged any need for this Court to protect that jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss Green’s “Original Application for Writ of Mandamus”

for want of jurisdiction.

AL SCOGGINS Senior Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Senior Justice Al Scoggins1 Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 30, 2019 [OT06]

1The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).

In re Green Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Lowell Quincy Green, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re Lowell Quincy Green (in Re Lowell Quincy Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Simmonds
271 S.W.3d 874 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)