in Re Lowell Quincy Green
This text of in Re Lowell Quincy Green (in Re Lowell Quincy Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-17-00066-CR
IN RE LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator’s petitions for writ of mandamus is denied.1
AL SCOGGINS Justice
1 Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus lack proof of service on any of the parties listed in his petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties and must contain proof of service. Id. at R. 9.5. Here, relator has not provided a certificate of service indicating that he has served his petition on the respondents. However, to expedite these matters, we invoke Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend the service requirement. Id. at R. 2. Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed March 22, 2017 [OT06]
In re Green Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Lowell Quincy Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lowell-quincy-green-texapp-2017.