in Re LifeCell Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 6, 2014·No. 04-14-00554-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 6, 2014

No. 04-14-00554-CV

IN RE LIFECELL CORPORATION

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On August 5, 2014, relator LifeCell Corporation filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on August 6th, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of August, 2014.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI10718, styled LifeCell Corporation v. Novadaq Technologies, Inc. and Novadaq Corp., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Peter A. Sakai presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re LifeCell Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re LifeCell Corporation (in Re LifeCell Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.