in Re LifeCell Corporation
This text of in Re LifeCell Corporation (in Re LifeCell Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 6, 2014
No. 04-14-00554-CV
IN RE LIFECELL CORPORATION
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On August 5, 2014, relator LifeCell Corporation filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on August 6th, 2014.
_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of August, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI10718, styled LifeCell Corporation v. Novadaq Technologies, Inc. and Novadaq Corp., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Peter A. Sakai presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re LifeCell Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lifecell-corporation-texapp-2014.