In re Leyden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Leyden

96 A.D.2d 1124, 467 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19788

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1124 (In re Leyden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Leyden, 96 A.D.2d 1124, 467 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, in accordance with section 90 (subd 4, par b) of the Judiciary Law, on the ground that respondent has been disbarred by virtue of a felony conviction. Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on November 12, 1964. On August 1,1983, he pleaded guilty in the County Court, Albany County, to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree (two counts), a class D felony (Penal Law, § 155.35). On August 29, 1983 he "was sentenced to five years’ probation on each count. Respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State upon his conviction of a felony (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4, par a) and the instant proceeding to "strike his name from the roll of attorneys is merely a formality (subd 4, par b; Matter of Ginsberg, 1 NY2d 144). Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, in accordance with section 90 (subd 4, par b) of the Judiciary Law, on the ground that respondent has been disbarred by virtue of a felony conviction. Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on November 12, 1964. On August 1,1983, he pleaded guilty in the County Court, Albany County, to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree (two counts), a class D felony (Penal Law, § 155.35). On August 29, 1983 he "was sentenced to five years’ probation on each count. Respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State upon his conviction of a felony (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4, par a) and the instant proceeding to "strike his name from the roll of attorneys is merely a formality (subd 4, par b; Matter of Ginsberg, 1 NY2d 144). Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1124, 467 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-leyden-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack