In re Freeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Freeman

134 A.D.2d 726, 520 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 A.D.2d 726 (In re Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Freeman, 134 A.D.2d 726, 520 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner moves for an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, in accordance with Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that respondent has been convicted of a felony.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1956. On October 5, 1987, he was convicted in the County Court of Tompkins County of the crime of attempted sexual abuse, first degree, a class E felony (Penal Law §§ 130.65, 110.05). He was sentenced to a term of conditional discharge for a period of three years and a surcharge of $100.

Respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State upon his conviction of a felony (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]) and the instant application to strike his name from the roll of attorneys is merely a formality (Matter of Ginsberg, 1 NY2d 144; Matter of Leyden, 96 AD2d 1124).

Motion granted and respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Casey and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI