In Re Lewis

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Lewis

979 A.2d 629, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 348, 2009 WL 2460894

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 13, 2009

Docket09-BG-844

StatusPublished

This text of 979 A.2d 629 (In Re Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Lewis, 979 A.2d 629, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 348, 2009 WL 2460894 (D.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the petition for reinstatement, and the Office of Bar Counsel’s report stating that it is not opposed to the petition, and it appearing that the petitioner has satisfied the necessary criteria and shown that he is fit to resume the practice of law, see In re Roundtree, 503 A.2d 1215, 1217 (D.C.1985); D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 16(d) (2009), and has submitted the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is granted conditioned upon the petitioner’s continued compliance with the repayment plan he has entered into with the Client Security Trust Fund. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with the conditions of this order he will be immediately suspended on an interim basis pending further action by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI