In Re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United States

182 F.3d 1297, 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5721, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18403, 1999 WL 594949
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 6, 1999·No. 97-4845·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United States, 182 F.3d 1297, 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5721, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18403, 1999 WL 594949 (11th Cir. 1999).

182 F.3d 1297 (In Re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pert v. United States (In Re Pert)
248 B.R. 659 (M.D. Florida, 2000)
Johnson v. United States (In Re Johnson)
283 B.R. 694 (N.D. Texas, 2000)
United States v. Fretz
248 B.R. 183 (N.D. Alabama, 2000)
United States v. Carnes (In Re Carnes)
244 B.R. 435 (W.D. Missouri, 2000)
Griffith v. United States
174 F.3d 1222 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)