Griffith v. United States
This text of 174 F.3d 1222 (Griffith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________
No. 97-4845 ________________________________
D.C. Docket No. 94-0147-cv Bktcy. No. 93-0361 FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT IN RE: LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH, 08/06/99 THOMAS K. KAHN Debtor. CLERK
LEROY CHARLES GRIFFITH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________________________________________________
(Opinion May 11 , 1999, ___ F.3d ____, 11th Cir., 1999)
(August 6, 1999)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion
of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in
favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The
previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.eb4845or
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 F.3d 1222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-united-states-ca11-1999.