In re Lee

27 A.D.3d 1136, 810 N.Y.S.2d 715
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 2006·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John W. Grow, J.), entered October 22, 2004. The order, among other things, authorized petitioner to administer medication to respondent.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order granting petitioner’s application seeking authorization to administer medication to respondent over his objection. The order has since expired, rendering the appeal moot (see Matter of McCue, 281 [1137] AD2d 420 [2001]; see also Matter of McGrath, 245 AD2d 1081 [1997]), and this case does not fall within any exception to the mootness doctrine (see McGrath, 245 AD2d at 1082; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Green and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lee, 27 A.D.3d 1136, 810 N.Y.S.2d 715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 1136 (In re Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BOSCO, MAUREEN v. F., QUINTON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
In re Bosco
100 A.D.3d 1525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
BOSCO, MAUREEN v. NIEVES, MICHAEL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Bosco v. Michael N.
93 A.D.3d 1207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Gilbert v. Endres
34 A.D.3d 1218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)