BOSCO, MAUREEN v. NIEVES, MICHAEL

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 2012
DocketCA 11-00467
StatusPublished

This text of BOSCO, MAUREEN v. NIEVES, MICHAEL (BOSCO, MAUREEN v. NIEVES, MICHAEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BOSCO, MAUREEN v. NIEVES, MICHAEL, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

268 CA 11-00467 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MAUREEN BOSCO, ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL N., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

EMMETT J. CREAHAN, DIRECTOR, MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, UTICA (JASON D. FLEMMA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARLENE O. TUCZINSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered December 9, 2010. The order, among other things, determined that respondent lacked the capacity to make a reasoned decision concerning his own treatment and adjudged that medication may be administered to respondent over his objection.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order granting the application of petitioner seeking authorization to administer medication to respondent over his objection. The order has since expired, rendering this appeal moot, and this case does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Rene L., 27 AD3d 1136; Matter of McGrath, 245 AD2d 1081).

Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Lee
27 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re McGrath
245 A.D.2d 1081 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BOSCO, MAUREEN v. NIEVES, MICHAEL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bosco-maureen-v-nieves-michael-nyappdiv-2012.