In re Lawrence W.

42 A.D.3d 573, 840 N.Y.S.2d 140
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 31, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 42 A.D.3d 573 (In re Lawrence W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lawrence W., 42 A.D.3d 573, 840 N.Y.S.2d 140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to terminate the mother’s parental rights, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact finding and disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Cooney, J.), entered June 16, 2006, as, after a hearing, determined that the adoption of the child could proceed without his consent and without further notice to him.

Ordered that the order of fact finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We discern no basis to disturb the finding of the Family Court that the father’s consent to the adoption of the child was not required, as he did not maintain “substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the child” within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d). The father never paid child support, and failed to have regular communication with either the child or the child’s custodian during the father’s incarceration for most of the child’s life (see Matter of Kianna C., 292 AD2d 380 [2002]). His belated interest in the child after he was released from prison was “neither sufficiently prompt nor sufficiently substantial” to satisfy Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d), and to require his consent to the child’s adoption (Matter of John E. v Doe, 164 AD2d 375, 382 [1990]; see Matter of [574]*574Sergio LL., 269 AD2d 699 [2000]). Spolzino, J.E, Skelos, Lifson and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re De'Von M.F.C.
105 A.D.3d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Julian J.C.
96 A.D.3d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Jayquan J.
77 A.D.3d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Dasani-Amru B.
74 A.D.3d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Kevin A.
61 A.D.3d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Serenity Anya C.
60 A.D.3d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Sharissa G.
51 A.D.3d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re William B.
47 A.D.3d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A.D.3d 573, 840 N.Y.S.2d 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lawrence-w-nyappdiv-2007.