In re Laub

810 A.2d 413, 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 662, 2002 WL 31520460
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 14, 2002
DocketNo. 01-BG-1227
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 810 A.2d 413 (In re Laub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Laub, 810 A.2d 413, 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 662, 2002 WL 31520460 (D.C. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Jeffrey M. Laub, a member of our Bar, be disbarred on the basis of his conviction of mail fraud in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. We have previously held that mail fraud is a crime of moral turpitude requiring disbarment. See, e.g., In re Evans, 793 A.2d 468, 469 (D.C.2002) (per curiam); D.C.Code § 11-2503(a) (2001). Neither Bar Counsel nor Laub has excepted to the Board’s recommendation. See, e.g., In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1288 (D.C.1995) (describing deferential standard of review where the Board’s recommendation is unopposed). Accordingly, Jeffrey M. Laub is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia.1

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Juliano
912 A.2d 553 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 A.2d 413, 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 662, 2002 WL 31520460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-laub-dc-2002.