In re Landowitz
71 P.2d 334, 22 Cal. App. 2d 733, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 203
Opinion
The questions presented in the above matter are essentially the same as those decided in In re Kazas, an application for a writ of habeas corpus, ante, p. 161 [70 Pac. (2d) 962]; and on the authority thereof the petitioner is discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Landowitz, 71 P.2d 334, 22 Cal. App. 2d 733, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 203 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).
71 P.2d 334 (In re Landowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners
219 Cal. App. 2d 504 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
French Art Cleaners v. State Board of Dry Cleaners
198 P.2d 91 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)
In Re Landowitz
22 Cal. App. 2d 733 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)