in Re Kyle Franks
This text of in Re Kyle Franks (in Re Kyle Franks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 17, 2016.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-16-00377-CR
IN RE KYLE FRANKS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 611262
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 9, 2016, relator Kyle Franks filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator complains that he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Relator is requesting habeas corpus relief. The courts of appeals have no original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. In re Ayers, No. 14-16- 00274-CR, — S.W.3d —, 2016 WL 1533747, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 14, 2016, orig. proceeding). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 (West 2015); Ayers, 2016 WL 1533747, at *1. Therefore, this court is without jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition requesting habeas corpus relief.
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kyle Franks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kyle-franks-texapp-2016.