In re Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kramer

129 A.D.2d 661, 514 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45345

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 661 (In re Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kramer, 129 A.D.2d 661, 514 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner for this court to appoint an attorney to protect the interests of the respondent Stuart R. Kramer’s clients, pursuant to section 691.10 (g) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR).

Motion granted. Pursuant to section 691.10 (g) of the rules of this court, the following named attorney is designated and appointed to inventory the files of the respondent Stuart R. Kramer and to protect the interest of his clients: Edward Sawchuk, Esq., 68 Middagh Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner for this court to appoint an attorney to protect the interests of the respondent Stuart R. Kramer’s clients, pursuant to section 691.10 (g) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR).

Motion granted. Pursuant to section 691.10 (g) of the rules of this court, the following named attorney is designated and appointed to inventory the files of the respondent Stuart R. Kramer and to protect the interest of his clients: Edward Sawchuk, Esq., 68 Middagh Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 661, 514 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kramer-nyappdiv-1987.