In re Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kramer

110 A.D.2d 735

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 A.D.2d 735 (In re Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kramer, 110 A.D.2d 735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondent is suspended from the practice of law forthwith, until the further order of this court, as it is determined that the conviction involves a serious crime.

Pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law § 90 [7]) the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts is authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court as petitioner against the respondent based upon the facts that constituted the crime for which respondent was convicted as contained in the supplemental petition, dated March 18, 1985.

The issues raised by the supplemental petition and the answer are referred to W. Bernard Richland, Esq., as Special Referee to hear and to report his findings which are to be heard together with the issues on the original petition and answer which were referred to him as Special Referee by order of this court dated February 3, 1984. Robert H. Straus, Esq., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Suite 1200, Municipal Building, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in the proceedings. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano & Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent is suspended from the practice of law forthwith, until the further order of this court, as it is determined that the conviction involves a serious crime.

Pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law § 90 [7]) the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts is authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court as petitioner against the respondent based upon the facts that constituted the crime for which respondent was convicted as contained in the supplemental petition, dated March 18, 1985.

The issues raised by the supplemental petition and the answer are referred to W. Bernard Richland, Esq., as Special Referee to hear and to report his findings which are to be heard together with the issues on the original petition and answer which were referred to him as Special Referee by order of this court dated February 3, 1984. Robert H. Straus, Esq., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Suite 1200, Municipal Building, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in the proceedings. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano & Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D.2d 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kramer-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack