in Re Komatsu America Corporation
Opinion
Order filed October 13, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-11-00883-CV
IN RE KOMATSU AMERICA CORPORATION, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
165th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2010-77680
ORDER
On October 12, 2011, relator, Komatsu America Corporation, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221. Relator asks this Court to order The Honorable Josefina M. Rendon, Judge of the 165th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to set aside her orders dated September 30, 2011, entered in trial court cause number 2010-77680, styled Mario Salinas, et al v, Dorsett Bros. Concrete Supply, Inc., et al. Relator claims the trial court abused its granting plaintffs’ motion to compel discovery.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition that relator’s request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. See Tex. R. App. p. 52.8(b), 52.10.
We therefore ORDER that the orders entered on September 30, 2011, by the court below be stayed in trial court cause number 2010-77680, styled Mario Salinas, et al v, Dorsett Bros. Concrete Supply, Inc., et al. Such orders are stayed until final decision by this Court of relator's petition for writ of mandamus, or until further orders of this Court.
Further, the court requests real parties in interest, Mario Salinas and Florencia Salinas, Individually and as Next Friends of the minor children Mario Salinas and Adilene Salinas, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before October 28, 2011.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Komatsu America Corporation (in Re Komatsu America Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.