in Re Komatsu America Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 2011
Docket14-11-00883-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Komatsu America Corporation (in Re Komatsu America Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Komatsu America Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order filed October 13, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00883-CV ____________

IN RE KOMATSU AMERICA CORPORATION, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-77680

ORDER

On October 12, 2011, relator, Komatsu America Corporation, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221. Relator asks this Court to order The Honorable Josefina M. Rendon, Judge of the 165th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to set aside her orders dated September 30, 2011, entered in trial court cause number 2010-77680, styled Mario Salinas, et al v, Dorsett Bros. Concrete Supply, Inc., et al. Relator claims the trial court abused its granting plaintffs’ motion to compel discovery.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition that relator’s request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. See Tex. R. App. p. 52.8(b), 52.10. We therefore ORDER that the orders entered on September 30, 2011, by the court below be stayed in trial court cause number 2010-77680, styled Mario Salinas, et al v, Dorsett Bros. Concrete Supply, Inc., et al. Such orders are stayed until final decision by this Court of relator's petition for writ of mandamus, or until further orders of this Court.

Further, the court requests real parties in interest, Mario Salinas and Florencia Salinas, Individually and as Next Friends of the minor children Mario Salinas and Adilene Salinas, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before October 28, 2011.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.221
Texas GV § 22.221

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Komatsu America Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-komatsu-america-corporation-texapp-2011.