In Re Kirkiles

779 A.2d 357, 2001 WL 950673
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 2001·No. 00-BG-518·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Respondent Demetrios C. Kirkiles is a member of the Florida Bar and the bar of this court. In March 1999, the Supreme Court of Florida publicly reprimanded respondent after he pled guilty to several disciplinary charges. Specifically, respondent admitted to failing to provide competent representation, failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and attempting to improperly limit his malpractice liability to a client.

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends reciprocal discipline of a public censure. A public censure is functionally equivalent to the public reprimand issued by the Supreme Court of Florida. See In re Macaulay, 737 A.2d 562, 553 (D.C.1999); In re Dreier, 651 A.2d 312 (D.C.1994). Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent objects to the Board’s report and recommendation. Given our limited scope of review and the presumption in favor of identical reciprocal discipline, we adopt the Board’s recommendation. See In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C.1995); In re Zilberberg, 612 A.2d 832, 834 (D.C.1992); D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(f). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Demetrios C. Kirkiles be and hereby is publicly censured.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Kirkiles, 779 A.2d 357, 2001 WL 950673 (D.C. 2001).

779 A.2d 357 (In Re Kirkiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Douglass
859 A.2d 1069 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
In Re MacCi
815 A.2d 1292 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)