In re Kingsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kingsley

242 A.D. 681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 681 (In re Kingsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kingsley, 242 A.D. 681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. The petitioner is entitled to the amount allowed by the surrogate for services rendered to the estate pursuant to the thirty-third provision of the will. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Seudder, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., with whom Davis, J., concurs, dissents and votes for reversal and dismissal of proceeding, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. The petitioner is entitled to the amount allowed by the surrogate for services rendered to the estate pursuant to the thirty-third provision of the will. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Seudder, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., with whom Davis, J., concurs, dissents and votes for reversal and dismissal of proceeding, with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kingsley-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack