In re Kingsley
242 A.D. 681
Opinions
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. The petitioner is entitled to the amount allowed by the surrogate for services rendered to the estate pursuant to the thirty-third provision of the will. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Seudder, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., with whom Davis, J., concurs, dissents and votes for reversal and dismissal of proceeding, with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Kingsley, 242 A.D. 681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 681 (In re Kingsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jessup v. . Smith
119 N.E. 403 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
O'Brien v. . Jackson
60 N.E. 238 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Brackett v. Ostrander
126 A.D. 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
In re Rabell
175 A.D. 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Ehlert
237 A.D. 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
In re the Estate of O'Brien
146 Misc. 555 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)