In re Kaye
This text of 281 A.D. 508 (In re Kaye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The original petition in this disciplinary matter charges respondent with knowingly issuing bad checks. A supplemental petition charges him with conspiring to obstruct justice.
[509]*509The evidence amply supports the first charge, and the only persuasive consideration in mitigation is that full restitution has been made.
There is much evidence to sustain the second charge, but considering the character of the witnesses against respondent and their doubtful credibility, we do not hold that the supplemental charge has been sustained.
Eespondent has previously been admonished with respect to his conduct and professional associations. He appears not to have taken the admonition sufficiently seriously. He should be suspended for a period of one year on the original charge.
Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.
Eespondent suspended for a period of one year. [See 282 App. Div. 667.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 508, 120 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaye-nyappdiv-1953.