In re Katherine S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Katherine S.

271 A.D.2d 538, 705 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3972

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 538 (In re Katherine S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Katherine S., 271 A.D.2d 538, 705 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Tracy S. appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper) of the Family Court, Dutchess County, entered May 12, 1994, which, after a hearing, found that she had neglected her children, and, inter alia, placed her under the supervision of the Dutchess County Department of Social Services for a period of up to 12 months.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the appellant Tracy S. neglected the subject children (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; § 1012 [f] [i]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Katherine S., 271 AD2d 538 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Tracy S. appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper) of the Family Court, Dutchess County, entered May 12, 1994, which, after a hearing, found that she had neglected her children, and, inter alia, placed her under the supervision of the Dutchess County Department of Social Services for a period of up to 12 months.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the appellant Tracy S. neglected the subject children (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; § 1012 [f] [i]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Katherine S., 271 AD2d 538 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 538, 705 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katherine-s-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack