In re Katarina B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Katarina B.

284 A.D.2d 1016, 727 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 1016 (In re Katarina B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Katarina B., 284 A.D.2d 1016, 727 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly refused to vacate the suspended judgment and to terminate the placement of respondent’s child. Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent failed to comply with certain conditions in the suspended judgment (see, Matter of Christopher C., 284 AD2d 944 [decided herewith]; Matter of Victor C., 284 AD2d 945 [decided herewith]; Matter of Daryl H., 272 AD2d 935). The belated attempts of respondent to comply with the conditions of the suspended judgment after its expiration but before the hearing on her petition to vacate the suspended judgment were insufficient to establish that the child should be returned to her custody. (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Klim, J. — Vacate Judgment.) Present: Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly refused to vacate the suspended judgment and to terminate the placement of respondent’s child. Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent failed to comply with certain conditions in the suspended judgment (see, Matter of Christopher C., 284 AD2d 944 [decided herewith]; Matter of Victor C., 284 AD2d 945 [decided herewith]; Matter of Daryl H., 272 AD2d 935). The belated attempts of respondent to comply with the conditions of the suspended judgment after its expiration but before the hearing on her petition to vacate the suspended judgment were insufficient to establish that the child should be returned to her custody. (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Klim, J. — Vacate Judgment.) Present: Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 1016, 727 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katarina-b-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack