In re Daryl H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Daryl H.

272 A.D.2d 935, 708 N.Y.S.2d 662

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 935 (In re Daryl H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Daryl H., 272 A.D.2d 935, 708 N.Y.S.2d 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court’s determination that respondent failed to comply with a condition in the suspended judgment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Jennifer T., 224 AD2d 843, 845; see also, Matter of Orange County Dept, of Social Servs. v Lisa Sue C., 220 AD2d 511). Although respondent completed a drug treatment program, it is undisputed that she did not do so during the term of the suspended judgment. We note that it is also undisputed that respondent refused to provide releases to permit petitioner to obtain information from agencies with whom respondent was involved, thereby violating the other condition in the suspended judgment that she cooperate with petitioner. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court’s determination that respondent failed to comply with a condition in the suspended judgment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Jennifer T., 224 AD2d 843, 845; see also, Matter of Orange County Dept, of Social Servs. v Lisa Sue C., 220 AD2d 511). Although respondent completed a drug treatment program, it is undisputed that she did not do so during the term of the suspended judgment. We note that it is also undisputed that respondent refused to provide releases to permit petitioner to obtain information from agencies with whom respondent was involved, thereby violating the other condition in the suspended judgment that she cooperate with petitioner. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 935, 708 N.Y.S.2d 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daryl-h-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack