In Re Kaleb H.
This text of 33 A.3d 739 (In Re Kaleb H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re KALEB H.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dana M. Hrelic, Michael S. Taylor and Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Stephen G. Vitelli, assistant attorney general in opposition.
*740 The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 829, 29 A.3d 173, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the respondent mother failed to present sufficient factual allegations to raise reasonable doubt as to her competence?
"2. If the answer to question one is in the negative, does the same due process right to a competency evaluation that exists in termination of parental rights proceedings also attach to commitment proceedings?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A.3d 739, 303 Conn. 916, 2011 WL 7037095, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaleb-h-conn-2011.